Artificial  Intelligence  Supports  Claim  of
Room-Temperature Superconductivity

       Since 2011 Superconductors.ORG has made claims of finding no less than 49 different room-temperature superconductors (RTSC). Those claims were made based on a sudden resistance drop and the appearance of diamagnetism at nearly the same temperature. Many of those discoveries also displayed a specific heat change at Tc and all showed a drop in quiescent background noise below Tc. These factors taken together strongly suggest that they are indeed room-temperature superconductors, albeit with a low volume fraction. We thought it might be interesting to ask OpenAI's new artificial intelligence ChatGPT what it thinks about these claims. Below is part of that conversation.

SC.org:  If a material displays a sudden resistance drop and diamagnetism at the same temperature, is it superconductive?

ChatGPT:  If a material exhibits both a sudden resistance drop to zero and perfect diamagnetism at the same temperature, it strongly suggests that the material has entered a superconducting state.

SC.org:  [Ibid] Is it superconductive even if the volume fraction (percentage) is low?

ChatGPT:  Yes, if a material displays a sudden resistance drop to zero and diamagnetism at the same temperature, it indicates that the material has entered a superconducting state, regardless of its volume fraction or percentage. Superconductivity is not dependent on the volume fraction of the material. Even if the superconducting phase occupies only a small fraction of the overall material, it can still exhibit the characteristic properties of superconductivity, such as zero resistance and perfect diamagnetism. This is known as a "mixed-state" or "flux-pinning" regime, where regions of superconductivity coexist with non-superconducting regions. Higher volume fractions of superconducting phase typically result in more robust superconductivity and enhanced superconducting properties. Nevertheless, the presence of superconductivity, as indicated by the simultaneous resistance drop and diamagnetism, is still significant even if the volume fraction is low.

SC.org:  [Ibid] Is this an indication of superconductivity even if it is above room temperature?

ChatGPT:  If you observe a sudden resistance drop and diamagnetism above room temperature, it would be a significant and potentially groundbreaking finding. To validate your observations, it is crucial to conduct a series of additional experiments and measurements. Repeat the experiments multiple times to ensure that the observed effects are consistent and reproducible.

SC.org:  [This was done] in 49 different copper-oxides. [So] do they validate each other if they use the same [superconductivity] mechanism of planar weight disparity?

ChatGPT:  Observing signs of low volume fraction superconductivity at room temperature in 49 different copper-oxides is certainly an intriguing finding. If these observations are consistent across multiple materials and employ the same mechanism of planar weight disparity, it can provide additional support for the validity of the phenomenon.

SC.org:  Can a sudden drop in resistance and the appearance of diamagnetism at the same temperature be explained by anything other than superconductivity?

ChatGPT:  A sudden drop in resistance and the appearance of diamagnetism at the same temperature are indeed strongly indicative of superconductivity. [Though] it is important to consider alternative explanations and rule out other possibilities. However, [having said that] the appearance of diamagnetism is not typically associated with an insulator-metal transition [or] magnetic ordering transitions. [Similarly] structural phase transitions do not typically result in the appearance of diamagnetism ... [nor do] quantum tunneling, localization effects, [or] quantum interference.

BACK to "News" page at Superconductors.ORG